http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/07/us/lawyers-say-hearing-for-9-11-defendants-was-rigged.html
Several of the lawyers amplified their complaints about restrictions on what they could discuss — including a Dec. 27, 2011, prison order about “contraband” information that includes details about the historic perspectives of jihadi activities and certain information about detention operations.
The New York Times article addresses somewhat the matter of detention operations, but not that of the "historic perspectives".
How surprising should that be really from such a publication that presents such ideas as Europe not having any religious wars since about 1648?
How Cops Are Using Flock Safety's ALPR Network to Surveil Protesters and
Activists
-
It's no secret that 2025 has given Americans plenty to protest about. But
as news cameras showed protesters filling streets of cities across the
country,...
4 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment