http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/07/us/lawyers-say-hearing-for-9-11-defendants-was-rigged.html
Several of the lawyers amplified their complaints about restrictions on what they could discuss — including a Dec. 27, 2011, prison order about “contraband” information that includes details about the historic perspectives of jihadi activities and certain information about detention operations.
The New York Times article addresses somewhat the matter of detention operations, but not that of the "historic perspectives".
How surprising should that be really from such a publication that presents such ideas as Europe not having any religious wars since about 1648?
Court Rules Against Citizen Journalists in DMCA Takedown Case—EFF Will
Appeal
-
A federal court in Massachusetts has ruled that copyright holders can issue
online takedown notices based on a subjective belief of copyright
infringemen...
3 days ago
No comments:
Post a Comment