http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/07/us/lawyers-say-hearing-for-9-11-defendants-was-rigged.html
Several of the lawyers amplified their complaints about restrictions on what they could discuss — including a Dec. 27, 2011, prison order about “contraband” information that includes details about the historic perspectives of jihadi activities and certain information about detention operations.
The New York Times article addresses somewhat the matter of detention operations, but not that of the "historic perspectives".
How surprising should that be really from such a publication that presents such ideas as Europe not having any religious wars since about 1648?
Search Engines, AI, And The Long Fight Over Fair Use
-
*We're taking part in Copyright Week, a series of actions and discussions
supporting key principles that should guide copyright policy. Every day
this w...
1 day ago
No comments:
Post a Comment