http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/07/us/lawyers-say-hearing-for-9-11-defendants-was-rigged.html
Several of the lawyers amplified their complaints about restrictions on what they could discuss — including a Dec. 27, 2011, prison order about “contraband” information that includes details about the historic perspectives of jihadi activities and certain information about detention operations.
The New York Times article addresses somewhat the matter of detention operations, but not that of the "historic perspectives".
How surprising should that be really from such a publication that presents such ideas as Europe not having any religious wars since about 1648?
LGBT Q&A: Your Online Speech and Privacy Questions, Answered
-
This year, like almost all years before, LGBTQ+ Pride month is taking place
at a time of burgeoning anti-LGBTQ+ violence, harassment, and criticism.
Lawm...
2 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment