http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/07/us/lawyers-say-hearing-for-9-11-defendants-was-rigged.html
Several of the lawyers amplified their complaints about restrictions on what they could discuss — including a Dec. 27, 2011, prison order about “contraband” information that includes details about the historic perspectives of jihadi activities and certain information about detention operations.
The New York Times article addresses somewhat the matter of detention operations, but not that of the "historic perspectives".
How surprising should that be really from such a publication that presents such ideas as Europe not having any religious wars since about 1648?
Congress Narrowed the GUARD Act, But Serious Problems Remain
-
Following criticism, lawmakers have narrowed the GUARD Act, a bill aimed at
restricting minors’ access to certain AI systems. The earlier version could
h...
4 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment