http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/07/us/lawyers-say-hearing-for-9-11-defendants-was-rigged.html
Several of the lawyers amplified their complaints about restrictions on what they could discuss — including a Dec. 27, 2011, prison order about “contraband” information that includes details about the historic perspectives of jihadi activities and certain information about detention operations.
The New York Times article addresses somewhat the matter of detention operations, but not that of the "historic perspectives".
How surprising should that be really from such a publication that presents such ideas as Europe not having any religious wars since about 1648?
The Year States Chose Surveillance Over Safety: 2025 in Review
-
2025 was the year age verification went from a fringe policy experiment to
a sweeping reality across the United States. Half of the U.S. now mandates
age...
2 days ago
No comments:
Post a Comment