http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/07/us/lawyers-say-hearing-for-9-11-defendants-was-rigged.html
Several of the lawyers amplified their complaints about restrictions on what they could discuss — including a Dec. 27, 2011, prison order about “contraband” information that includes details about the historic perspectives of jihadi activities and certain information about detention operations.
The New York Times article addresses somewhat the matter of detention operations, but not that of the "historic perspectives".
How surprising should that be really from such a publication that presents such ideas as Europe not having any religious wars since about 1648?
In Memoriam: Barry Steinhardt
-
Barry Steinhardt, a lifelong privacy champion and an early leader in the
battle for digital civil liberties who served as EFF’s president in
1998-99, die...
2 days ago
No comments:
Post a Comment