http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/07/us/lawyers-say-hearing-for-9-11-defendants-was-rigged.html
Several of the lawyers amplified their complaints about restrictions on what they could discuss — including a Dec. 27, 2011, prison order about “contraband” information that includes details about the historic perspectives of jihadi activities and certain information about detention operations.
The New York Times article addresses somewhat the matter of detention operations, but not that of the "historic perspectives".
How surprising should that be really from such a publication that presents such ideas as Europe not having any religious wars since about 1648?
Hawaii Takes a Stand for Privacy: HCR 144/HR 138 Calls for Investigation of
Crisis Pregnancy Centers
-
In a bold push for medical privacy, Hawaii's House of Representatives has
introduced HCR 144/HR 138, a resolution calling for the Hawaii Attorney
General...
19 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment